Wednesday, June 21

WWJB?

At a youth camp, an enterprising youth pastor came up with the idea of making bracelets with the intials 'WWJD?' on them. The "What Would Jesus Do?" idea has since become an enormous success worldwide, with bracelets (and other paraphernalia) available across the english-speaking world. It is practically the standard for moral decision-making in many circles, and young people especially find great comfort and challenge in its simplicity.

The call to imitate Christ is certainly a biblical one. But I was reading something yesterday that challenged my understanding of what this means (Kenda Creasy Dean's Practicing Passion). The Greek term for imitation used is mimesis. Crucially, this kind of imitation is not Xerox-style mimicry, but more like identification. Imitating Christ is less about copying the things he did and more about taking on his attributes, imitating the person he is. This isn't quick-fix morality, but becoming "little Christs": a much more complicated approach to the Christian life.

How useful is the concept of WWJD anyway? Do we really want our young people to copy everything Jesus did, including turning over tables in temples, clashing with religious and civic leaders, hanging on a cross? Maybe we do - but in asking 'WWJD?' let's not just screen Jesus for the culturally 'safe' moral choices he made - let's look at the whole picture.

But even the moral issues get cloudy. Are we supposed to transpose the ethics of 1st Century Palestine to our 21st Century global cutlure? "What would Jesus Do" about genetic modification, homosexual Civil Parnterships, global ecological threats, international business ethics...? Some may think they have a fast answer to these issues, but it certainly isn't found in any direct WWJD?-style 'Biblical' ethic.

This goes well beyond wearing a bracelet with "WWJD?" or, come to mention it, "Make Poverty History" on it. Don't get me wrong, I'm not against bracelets per se. But I'm not sure they do justice to huge questions such as ethics or poverty. They're just too cheap, to easy to wear (and take off!). How many of us are still wearing our white Make Poverty History bracelets? (I'm not) How many took that campaign any further than a one-day march, web banner or petition (I didn't). Is this the approach we want to take to our imitation of Christ?

Real imitation of Christ means identifying with who he is - in his life, but also his death and resurrection. What would happen if we moved beyond the simple morality of a 'WWJD?' bracelet and wrote across our lives (and deaths and resurrections) the slogan "Who Would Jesus Be?". There's no simple answer to that question, but you can guarantee it would involve total surrender of ourselves in passionate love for 'the other' (even surrender of our cherished moral standpoints? or our cherished understanding of the Christian faith? - and if this sounds too far read Endo's Silence or Dietrich Bonhoeffer).

'WWJB?' He'd be a self-giving passionate lover, especially of the least deserving. But in giving himself he would find himself caught up in the endlessly selfless love of the Trinue God. And in Christ we can identify with that, But it won't produce simple morality - it'll produce intense, passionate martyr-like "radicals and prophets" (Dean) in us and in our young people. I'm up for that kind of imitation.

8 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Attempting to follow a WWJD model of living flirts with the ego-feeding notion that we can come even close to emulating Christ's pure nature - something I wouldn't suggest is wise to consider. We have to get real with ourselves and more importantly, with Him. We are weak, we do fail and we must continually acknowledge this before Him. While it is most certainly worthwhile to attempt living by the fruits of the spirit, I think we will set ourselves (and young people) up for serious disapointment if we are arrogant enough to believe we can compare our efforts to that of Christ.

Thanks for your honesty about your fleeting Make Poverty History efforts (and bangle! Mine has retreated to its hanging place on my bedroom door knob...) Mind you, when it comes to young people - the bangle and such ARE good tools, practically speaking. As much as you might hope to change it, kids generally will follow trends.

Congrats on the new job and home. Will you still try to come back for your coffee shop discussions? Still hoping to attend sometime (albeit probably sitting quietly wedged back in a corner with notebook in hand)!

6/21/2006 11:07:00 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oy. JUST to clarify, I am not disputing the idea of trying to live Christ-like, providing we continue to recognise our human short-fallings. However, I do believe it unwise to instill slogans such as WWJD into open and vulnerable young minds. It is an exceedingly high expectation to place on a child, who often interprets ideas like this literally and of course will fail to live up to it.

6/21/2006 11:32:00 pm  
Blogger Johnny said...

Perhaps its not Who Would Jesus Be, as if he was only the perfect man in history in 1st Century Palestine. I'm trying to make some sense of Eph 2:1-10 just now. There is a sense of "job done", we are alive in Christ, raised up with Christ. We have a righteousness, that is Christ living in us now. So its not Who Would Jesus Be, but "Who Is Jesus Being". (I'm so sorry to lose the 2 "W"s as it is pretty nifty.) This is not an ego boosting denial of our failures, but a humbling recognition of the source of our true identity. We can choose to live according to our identity, or contrary. Perhaps we can only answer questions of international contemporary ethics and the others in the list, if we ask "Who did Jesus reveal himself to be, and how is he Being that person, through us, now"

6/23/2006 10:27:00 pm  
Blogger Jamie said...

Great points, Johnny. I guess if we really want to live according to our identity 'in Christ', we need to think about that in a Trinitarian way, too. So limiting it to Jesus is also a shortcoming of the WWJD model. It seems that when it comes to ethics we instinctively try to separate out the actions of Jesus from who Jesus is - I think unwisely. Again (for Theology geeks) the division of Economic/Immanent Trinity is in evidence.

What and who is the Trinity doing and being, through the Spirit in us? Not as catchy, admittedly.

6/24/2006 01:18:00 am  
Blogger boxthejack said...

WAWITTDABTTSIU? I'm discovering a fondness for WWJD that I've never felt before.

6/26/2006 09:37:00 am  
Blogger Johnny said...

Tonight in the Simpsons (ch4), Duffman, was faced with a dilemma, to serve the corporate head of Duff Beer in his dastardly plan to move the Springfield Isotopes (baseball team) to Albaquerque, or to respond to the Springfield Mob, fired up by Homer's hunger strike. He shouted "What Would Jesus Do" and threw the Duff Chairman out of the stadium. How can you argue with Simpsonian Theology.

6/27/2006 08:32:00 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Someone reminded me recently that I had proposed a new item in the WWJD line. Many people need to be reminded at key points in time of Jesus and what he would do. This led me to the idea of WWJD pants and boxer shorts. For the young and frisky Christian they could be a timely reminder to them or their potential partner to retain some moral purity. Any buyers ??
Pete

7/21/2006 02:26:00 pm  
Blogger Nodrog said...

rather bleakly, a class discussion in Christology (I think) recently threw up a comment relating to the perceived religion/politics/imperialist democracy mix, particularly 'over the pond' - Who Would Jesus Bomb?

11/19/2006 09:50:00 pm  

Post a Comment

<< Home