Thursday, March 30

Derren Brown: Messiah

This is the title of a show I watched last night (which, incidentally, would be an excellent resource for studies of postmodernism!). Basically, the idea of the show is that Brown uses his psychological skills to raise questions about our acceptance of belief systems. He pretends to be (among other things) a medium, a UFO abductee and a Christian evangelist and in ease case wins the support of influential people in each of these 'faith groups'. By showing how reproducable these experiences are through psychological sugestion, he is not debunking or mocking any of these belief systems, but what he is doing is raising questions about our acceptance of power and authority.

Most interesting for me was the sequence on Christianity - where Brown (who was himself an evangelical Christian until his mid-twenties) uses suggestion to create "physical conversion" experiences in a group of atheists (getting them to fall over, collapse to their chairs and subsequently profess a belief in God).

Now I don't agree with all Brown says or does, but I do think there is a message here for us to hear. When we have (a) a theology of "conversion-as-event" (which, I believe, is not given the same weight in Scripture) and (b) a church model which has a great focus on the authority and personality of the man in the pulpit, we open ourselves to Brown's criticism. It is demonstrably true that "conversion" experiences can be acheived through psychological manipulation, and we need to be careful that we don't unwittingly produce a Christian-veneer version of Brown's show. Of course it would help if we didn't place too much weight on such experiences in the first place.

I currently go to a church where most believe that the spiritual gifts of tongues, prophecy etc. have ceased. I, for the record, disagree. But you don't need to be charistmatic to be at risk of psychological manipulation. All you need (as Brown shows) is a powerful personality 'up front' in a position of authority. I wonder if models of church which focus on the pulpit and preaching (sometimes almost exclusively) are inherently liable to create such a manipulative environment. What do you reckon?

Then there's the question of questioning. I think that honest questioning of our faith (if done constructively) leads to growth in faith. But how much questioning is healthy? What can we do to provide suitable environments for honest questioning - and not just for 'new converts' or 'seekers' but all believers?

I have my thoughts on these issues, but in light of Brown's show, I'll keep them to myself (for now) and ask the questions... ;)

J

P.S. There's more on the show on Derren Brown's webpage here, and I read a good (and short) review of the show on the channel 4 website here.
P.P.S. The other show I watched last night was a Newsnight special on anti-war protests by Iraq veterans - which contained many other examples of people accepting without question the views of those in power and authority; in this case, later totally (and sometimes angrily) reversing them!

3 Comments:

Blogger Brodie said...

Simon Mayo on Radio 5 live interviewed Brown the other day. He spoke a little about his experiance in a Christian CU. It was sad to hear that here was a guy who had questions and was trying out stuff, but rather than help him with this stuff he was just told he was wrong and marginalised.

3/30/2006 10:57:00 pm  
Blogger lynn said...

I read Brodie's comment with interest. I believe too that there is an important place for asking questions. I have run lots of alpha courses and at the core of group time is allowing people to ask questions and not answer them for them (occasionally I find this hard!) - leaving the question unanswered allows others to put across their views and - this is great to observe - actually allows the questioner to formulate which views/answers they most align themselves with.

Westerhoff's model of spiritual development in children states that a "questioning phase" is necessary before children/young people/adults enter the "owned faith" stage. They decide to own their faith because they have found consistency and reliability in the answers they have received - or perhaps more importantly - in the life and witness of the person who gave the answers. He asserts that some adults have never made it to that stage.

From this I take that questions are important..but sometimes a step of faith is required to accept the answer. Is this too simplistic? I don't think so. Sometimes we just need to accept that "God is good" and that's it - He's a loving, trustworthy, heavenly Father and we have to go with Him on it!

I am so glad that I work with children - this is perhaps easier territory to be in than with (22 year old Derren Brown 10 years ago)!

4/01/2006 02:29:00 pm  
Blogger boxthejack said...

Perhaps. I think it's inadequate to say 'just go with it' where there appears to be a falsehood. Under no circumstances should any self-conscious human, who seems to know that people die and stay dead, believe the Jesus rose from the dead until they have examined the evidence.

Even when the evidence is examined there is no 100% certainty, and the Christian is forced to accept something that blows all their empirical data out of the water. "I've not seen someone raise from the dead but I believe someone did."

But when we adjust our narratives for making sense of the world to include this, and other startling claims of Christianity, as real, we find that everything from OT prophecy to our own relationships make more sense.

4/25/2006 11:20:00 am  

Post a Comment

<< Home